Hooray for two weeks paternity leave!

When the gahmen introduced two weeks paid paternity leave, it was a move people were expecting (pun intended) for a long time. However, they never expected the unintended side-effects.

What would you do with your paternity leave? Share your ideas in the comments below. And subscribe to be notified of new posts.
 








Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quantitative Easing aka I Piss on your Currencies.

Image
When politicians want to keep their jobs in the face of economic challenges they turn to a simple tool. Roll the printing presses, euphemistically called Quantitative Easing. QE in effect is telling the world “I piss on your currency.” Especially for the debtor who can print his own money in which the debt is also denominated and is accepted globally. QE 1: Nov 2008.  Fed buys $100B agency debt + $500B mortgage-backed securities (MBS), followed by another $750B MBS. QE 2: Nov 2010.   Fed buys $600B long term treasuries followed by another $400B treasuries. QE 3: Sep 2012.   Fed buys $40B per month of MBS. QE 4: Sep 2012.   Two can play the game! China injects 1 Trillion Yuan ($157B) stimulus package. Image credit: Earth by NASA, Tidal Wave by Pamela Heckel on Unsplash (edited). QE 5: Jul 2020.  In response to the Covid-19 pandemic the Fed, PBOC, ECB, BOE, BOJ and other central banks unleash a tsunami of over $8 Trillion in monetary easing.  Sources: Forbes,...
Read more

The Bicentennial that wasn't

Image
The year is 2019. It is the year to commemorate the 200th anniversary of founding of Singapore by Thomas Stamford Raffles, but for some inexplicable reason, the powers that be decided to turn it into a Raffles bashing exercise.  There appears to be a conspiracy to cloud the issue of who really is the founder of Singapore, maybe even to "Photoshop" him out of the picture altogether! This concerted attempt at shifting the spotlight away from the birthday boy and focusing it on a bunch of gatecrashers from a different era is simply confounding.  My question is, what are the hidden motives for stealing the thunder from Raffles? There must be a mastermind behind all this, but who? To explore the what of the ways they’re doing it I have made this video: As for the why… I can’t figure it out except perhaps for two possibilities: One, highlighting Raffles as the founder would dim the aura surrounding another figure who has often been loosely credited with the founding of Singapore. ...
Read more

Did the British really leave Singapore in 1965?

Image
When young Thomas Stamford Raffles set foot on Singapore in 1819, he planted the seeds of success that were to turn the island of fishing villages into a throbbing metropolis by succeeding generations of islanders, colonialists and immigrants.  The British might have departed in 1965 with the city-state's independence, but vestiges of their presence are very visible to this day.
Read more